This is my hundredth post since 16th
August 2011. For two years before that,
while still working in Cambridge, I wrote a blog called World
and Time, which began life as a way of bringing Madingley Hall’s
programme of courses to the notice of a wider audience. I’m not sure it was
particularly successful in this, but keeping a blog became for me a way of
reflecting on how my interests in literature and teaching, Cambridge and Venice,
architecture and stained glass have helped to shape the life I lead now. In my
introductory post I wrote the following:
'Who am I writing this blog for? For my
students past and present; all those who have taught me more than I have taught
them, and with whom I have had great pleasure talking about why writing matters
and reading matters just as much; for students I have yet to meet; for friends
and colleagues; for fellow teachers of English; for anyone interested in what I
have to say, even if (particularly if) they don’t agree with me; for myself –
on the ‘how do I know what I think till I hear what I’ve said?’ principle.'
When I retired from Cambridge, I wanted to
stay in touch with these same students, colleagues and friends – some of whom
had been rash enough to ask me to keep writing. So I called my new blog (the first post of which was published on the
same day as my last post for World and
Time) simply Adrian Barlow’s Blog,
in the hope that people would find it easy to track down if they wanted to. So
it has proved, and the joy of blogging for the past four years has been hugely
enhanced by the number of new friends I have made, and old friends with whom I
have reconnected. I have been amazed by the popularity of my blog: it’s
currently receiving well over 100 visitors a day: not exactly ‘going viral’, I
admit, but readers come not just from the UK but from the US, Canada, Australia
and New Zealand, and more recently from Russia too. This has led to the only
conscious change in the way I have written: at the outset I assumed all my
readers would, broadly speaking, have the same frames of reference that I have;
more recently I have tried (unobtrusively, I hope) to give a bit more context
when introducing people, places, books etc., that may not be familiar to all.
I had written about blogs before I started
to write my own. In my book World and Time: Teaching Literature in
Context (C.U.P. 2009), I included a chapter entitled ‘Essays and blogs:
Woolf, Carter and Beard’, in which I tried to find links between the way three
writers I admire - Virginia Woolf, Angela Carter and Mary Beard - address their readers.
‘The blog,’ I wrote,
… is a
phenomenon already shifting our perception of how ideas, opinions and prejudices
can be shared and expressed in print – even if in cyberprint. Curiously, it has
led to a revival in the art of the conversational essay: everyone who writes a
blog tries, consciously or otherwise, to shape their prose in such a way as to
get across effectively what they want to say and, in doing so, to give an
impression of themselves as someone participating in a conversation.
My childhood introduction to the art of the
conversational essay was Charles Lamb’s ‘Dissertation upon Roast Pork’, and I
have been a fan of Lamb’s work ever since. It pleases me very much that a piece
written for World and Time in 2010, ‘Charles
Lamb and Cambridge’, led to an invitation to give a lecture (‘Lamb and
Cambridge: Cambridge and Lamb’) to the Charles Lamb Society in London earlier
this year. I’m pleased, too, that going to London to deliver this lecture
prompted me to compose one of the posts I am most pleased to
have written: an impromptu meditation on London, Lamb, and the poetry and people
to be found in Queen Square. But before I paused in that secluded square on my
way to give the lecture, I had no idea that before nightfall I’d have written ‘In
London, with Charles Lamb’.
Later in my chapter on essays and blogs, I
reflected on the significance of the term ‘post’:
You post a blog.
And this suggests two things: not only sending it by mail as if it were a
letter that someone would open and read at the other end, but also pasting it
on a wall like a poster so that any casual passer-by can read it [….] Posters
are general, aimed at a wide audience who may or may not take any notice.
It is one of the pleasures of blogging to
discover that people have taken
notice, and have sometimes been interested, moved or irritated sufficiently by
something I have written to post a reply, email or write directly. You get far
more feedback to a blog than to a book, in my experience. I treasure a message of thanks sent by someone working in the Janitor’s
Department of Alcatraz. But my thanks to all who have ever got in touch after
reading my blog.
This, however, will be my last post. 100
not out seems a good score with which to retire, if you’ll forgive the
cricketing metaphor. Over the past four years, a few pieces have written
themselves at a single sitting, but I find I’m spending longer planning,
writing and editing them now, for each one has to be just 1000 words. I still
enjoy this, greatly, but I don’t want my posts seeming laboured to those who
kindly read them. Besides, the book I’m now writing - Kempe: Life and Legacy - presses insistently. Some friends have suggested I publish a
collection from my blog. I’ve been tempted; I even chose a title, Short Measures. But blogs, I have concluded, are best left in their
native element, which is cyberspace.
Adrian Barlow
[illustration:
an urn inscribed with the words of William Blake’s poem ‘He who binds to
himself a joy’. My post about this poem, Short
Measures (i): William Blake and Eternity’s Sunrise, has been by far the
most visited page of my blog.
www.adrianbarlowsblog.blogspot.co.uk
will continue to be found at its present
address, and I am compiling an inventory of all my past posts, if anyone cares
to revisit them. I hope to publish this online
very soon.
Text and illustration © the author
I thought, reading the title, that you might have been alluding to the wonderful Empson poem - by coincidence I recited it from memory at a Poet In The City event a few days ago:
ReplyDeleteIt is this deep blankness is the real thing strange.
The more things happen to you the more you can't
Tell or remember even what they were.
The contradictions cover such a range.
The talk would talk and go so far aslant.
You don't want madhouse and the whole thing there.
I'm glad to find that your piece is happier and much less fraught. But the sadness is in me as a reader. I've looked forward to your posts, read and re-read them and kept them for the constant provocation to thought they embody and the marvellous tone you maintain of a civilised human being speaking aloud, naturally, eloquently, deeply and conscientiously - and with grace and warmth.
Thank you so much, Adrian for what you've written. I shall treasure the inventory. And if you sometimes feel like making it 101, please give way to the temptation.
It is always a joy to read your blogs, just to read something so well written. To dip in on occasion and probably not often enough but they will always be there and the inventory will be a bonus. Perhaps what we also need is an occasional special edition to keep us all on our toes. Many thanks for the enlightenment as always
ReplyDeleteDear Adrian – and end to your blogs? Inevitable, unwelcome and entirely understandable all at the same time. They have been (and will continue to be) a great source of pleasure and learning. Personally, I particularly enjoyed your forensic analyses of poetry and novels. Your discovery of Philip Larkin’s words buried in the depths of Julian Barnes’ novel “The Sense of an Ending” was marvellous.
ReplyDelete“How do I know what I think, until I hear what I’ve said?” is a very poignant line from Blog #100. When considering how the blog has unlocked so much more writing by non-specialists, it is for that “what do I think” reason that I consider this to be a very good thing overall. The next step that every blogger needs to reach is again addressed in your blog – that you are writing for anyone interested in what you have to say particularly if they do not agree with you. As a forum for debate, the blog is a perfect medium, especially if compared to Twitter, which regularly reveals how disagreement is fuelled and exacerbated by limited communication.
I think the other beauty of blogging, if it is done well, is that its most basic construct is the ability to link to other resources with such facility. Tim Berners-Lee’s origination of the world wide web meant that by creating a Universal Resource Locator (url) and a standardised protocol for viewing pages on any browser on any device (http), it became possible to see anything someone chose to publish. Your blogs have made consistently good use of these capabilities - I’ve followed links to read things and discovered resources I certainly would never have encountered by other means.
Like other correspondents, I encourage you not to resist the temptation to write more, just as soon as the urge arises. I understand the decision not to go to print with more of your blogs, but you’ve no need to really, if you maintain this site so that readers can go back to the archive. We will keep half an eye out on the “wicket”, just in case you decide to return to the crease to hit a few more runs!
Anil.
Ps: ….did anyone else pick-up the clue to one of Adrian’s “trashier” indulgences? Adrian is someone, I happen to know, who for all of the Eliot, Forster, Heaney and Auden has a penchant for spending a leisurely afternoon at the cinema watching Disney some other Hollywood blockbuster! Hence, I assume Adrian, the “Let it Go” title to this blog? So maybe, just maybe, there will be a post in future linking the latest Pixar production with the trials and tribulations of Rickie Elliot…..
Adrian – You gave me forewarning – warranted by the context of an email – that you were going to stop blogging, and so I cannot pretend to be surprised. It was your first blog, World and Time: What I did on my Holidays, which showed me that the blog can be a modern form of the essay, non solipsistic, and as finely written as you are able. It was that blog which encouraged me to start blogging, and having reached a total of 96, I found myself finally flagging about three months ago, to the extent that I don’t even have the energy to write a farewell blog! I would not compare my blogs to yours, but I have to wonder if there is not a natural time span to these things. And then with you not writing I have lost my benchmark!
ReplyDeleteWell, what riches and insights you have given us over the years! But I do understand how time consuming writing blogs can be: endless revisions over two days sometimes. (Fun at the time, but not so for Liz: “Are you blogging again?”!)
A fine innings, Adrian!